“Idle No More” (INM) reported in
various publications across Canada
have all alluded to the continuing saga of the “Indian Question”.
This is clearly in reference to
the added attention to Chief Spence’s hunger strike on the banks of the Ottawa
River and last year’s focus on Attawapiskat’s
housing crisis.
As per media functions into
presenting factual data is highly controversial and usually accompanies the
political ideologies of Canada’s
recognized parties; both at the Federal and Provincial levels.
Facebook, Twitter are namely the
two most popular social media sources in which INM propelled itself onto the
national stage; and as such garnered much support.
The message is being heard but is it really
being understood? Depending on who is, postulating an answer the responses to
the question is quite diverse.
In any case, dialogue is a good
beginning. Many political pundits such as Ezra Solomon seem to insinuate that
it is a matter of time before the movement experience some form of violence. As INM
protests-in reference to blockade tactics- in proximity of the US/Canada
borders and major transport routes such as rail and highways become more
frequent and the duration of these types of protests accrue.
The INM movement is being
perceived as a “lost cause” in the views of non-First Nations Canadians.
Lost in the sense that what was
initially concluded via the Treatises should not currently bare any legal,
social, or economic consequences. Are we
really looking at resolving issues stemming from the Indian Policy but in place
in the 1870’s?
Looking very loosely at the
political policies of the Conservative and Liberal Governments in the past 200
hundred years one would say...no.
Therefore, begins the meandering
saga of re-educating two maybe three generations into the factual instances of
the five W’s (who what where and when) accompanied by the most important
appendix, contextual relationship. Which the INM movement is currently
attempting to address.
Elaborating further, the
Treatises, all of them, were designed to displace, limit and forever extinct
alienable right of Cree, Ojibwa, Salteaux, among many other ethnic Nations to the land.
“That it was essential that the
Indian title to all the territory in the vicinity of the lake should be
extinguished so that settlers and traders might have undisturbed access to its
waters, shore, islands, inlets and tributary streams.” Privy Council of Canada
1875.
The issue of land needed to be
addressed in order to receive the increased immigration waves stemming from Eastern
Canada, the United-States and Europe.
We often hear how the ‘Indian’
approaches in Canada
were more humane and less infringing in dealing with Indian tribes across the
West. Not so.... In fact all efforts by Conservative and Liberal Indian Affairs
Department policies; were designed to assimilate an ethnic group employing
methods that assured increased assimilation rates to the fullest.
The first of such methods began
by defining what an ‘Indian’ was for the purposes of segregation and excluding
the Métis,
“It did so in very sweeping term,
for it included all persons of Indian ancestry and all persons married to such
persons, belonging to or recognized a belonging to an Indian band, and living
with a band.” John L Tobias, Sweet Promises.
Location of such Reserves had
to be approached. Once on reservations the process of
enforcing the Indian Policy became the responsibility of the North West Mounted
Police.
Success was to be measured by the
degree in which the ‘Indian’ assimilated the concept of property; and failed
miserably.
“It will be found desirable, to
assign to each family parts of the reserve for their own use, so as to give
them a sense of property in it.” said Lieutenant-Governor Alexander Morris in
Treaties in Canada
with the Indians.
The purpose of the Reserves was designed to
drive home this single outcome; eventually allotting 160 acres of land for each
family of five and successfully affranchise each family, which would no longer
be part of the reserve, “It also imposed the reserve system as a laboratory for
cultural (genocide) changes on the Plains Indians by means of these Treatises.”
John L Tobias, Sweet Promises.
Then, Commissioner Edgar Dewdney and Indian
Agents sole purpose within the reserve were to subjugate the Indian population
to abide by the will of the Minister of Indian Affairs. The methods employed
were often harsh, swift and without remorse.
“Backed by a small contingent of
Indian agents and Mounted Police, he used the distribution of rations as a
device to impose state authority on the First Nations population. Facing hunger
and destitution, First Nations people were compelled to settle on reserves,
adopt agriculture and send their children to mission schools.”
The need to decrease assistance
to the said reserves was in the view of the Government compulsory.
Prime Minister Steven Harper
cannot extinguish the Indian Act and therefore the laws governing Statues
Indians. He can however seek other methods to circumvent, weaken and re-define
the Indian Act, hence the introduction of Bill C-45.
“The problem is that the Canadian
Government continues to maintain and rely upon the cede and surrender
provisions in our treatise. This is the issue; no one would have surrendered
and ceded their land. No one in my community, anyway, would have ceded and
surrendered anything. However that’s what this whole country, {Canada}
is based on. That’s the problem. Section 35 has to be developed,” said Joan
Jack, a lawyer and councillor for the Berens River First Nation.
“ We have to get back to the
constitutional table and fill up section 35 with what we think should be in
there, because we are the indigenous people,” said Jack, adding, “...to move
the discussion from ward of the state back to were it originally started; as a
Nation to Nation state.”
A difficult proposition
considering that none of the previous or
current federal government (s) to date, were not a all interested in rendering
First Nations autonomous; in so doing, allowing First Nations the ability to
access, benefit and exercise their harvesting
rights in areas of commercial land developments, forestry, mining and
fisheries on treaty land.
“First Nations had land given to
them, as reserve land, held collectively and this is one partisan issue were
the Conservative Government over many years has consistently tried to privatize
reserve land. We are certainly seeing this government move very aggressively to
privatize every which way in the book {Indian Act} it can,” said Peter
Kulchyski, professor of Native Studies at the University
of Manitoba.
In order to “assimilate” Indians,
the Indian Act gave the government the power to supersede traditional methods
of governance. To this end the Indian Act is truly reprehensible; and did not
give moral authority to the federal governments, politicians, department
officials, the Roman and Anglican missionaries of 1869,1876, 1951, and 1969 to
deliberate the fate of First Nations without its representative equivalent.
The introduction of the ‘White
Paper’ by former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, then Minister of Indian Affairs
in 1969 signalled the strongest political resolution by any federal government
to permanently extinguish the Indian Act and in so doing the special statues of
First Nations in Canada.
“By adoption of this policy and by repealing
the Indian Act, the Indian would be assimilated by government fiat, and what
the Indian Act of 1876 had sought as a long-term goal--the expiration of the
Indian and Indian lands-would be realized,” John L. Tobias, Sweet Promises. In no way shape or form were reserves
intended to be sustained in perpetuity. The ability to successfully assimilate,
indoctrinate and educate future generations into western culture; the better. Mission
schools were best adapted to further the assimilation process. The resulting
experiments of the measures employed are still being felt 160 years later. The
vote did not exist on any reserve until 1960.
In terms of First Nations issues,
Canadians are over stimulated. The inequalities stemming from outstanding land
claims have created an unfavourable perception on what First Nations
self-governance entails for the rest of the country. “First Nation” issues;
continue to act as a rope being tightened around the neck of non-native
Canadians. Open or under-currents of racism-then and now still are present.
Every social ill imaginable remain within reserves; as to the root cause
sustaining these ills, again depend on who offers “expert” opinions as to the
“why”.
“Since 1983, we were making some
progress on Indigenous self-government; and there are communities that are now
self governing in the Yukon, British
Columbia, the Northwest
Territories and in northern Québec. In 2005-2006, that
process has stopped altogether.
Now they are re-focusing our
attention on the Indian Act; saying this is a step in the right direction
toward self-government. Well it’s not; the step forward for self-government is
an “Indian Nation Self-Government Recognition and Validation Act” that says
automatically First Nations come forward with the model they want and replace
the Indian Act with that,” explains Kulchyski.
I daresay the only moral and legal option for Canada
is to uphold existing Supreme Court decisions and give a clear mandate to the
federal government to resume and honor outstanding land claims with First
Nations on their behalf.
“The courts have moved the agenda
along further than the government. If we {today} decided to implement federal
policies that reflected the Supreme Court of Canada’s thinking we would be
miles ahead of where we are currently,” says Kulchyski.
Joan Jack agreed, “We’ve won 40
decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada; and how many have been implemented...
Maybe none eh? I think that the Canadian government and the Canadian taxpayers
should start focusing on the fact that our Supreme Court of Canada has said...
‘hey be nice’... and what’s happening?”
According to Kulchyski the need
to ratify Supreme Court decisions is crucial, “These decisions come to bear on
people’s daily lives and communities. This is why (First Nation) communities
can’t plan because they don’t know what kind of government funding they’re
going to receive. In the end, these are bread and butter issues for First
Nations (peoples).
We are going to sink to a worst
national catastrophe than we are already seeing, unless someone steps up to the
plate (federal government) and says “we have to develop a change of policy that
reflects what the (Supreme)courts are telling us so that the (process) moves
forward.”
What we are challenged with today
is the validity past governmental policies that have affected so many in such a
destructive way. Unfortunately, the result of those policies will be with us as
long as we deny the severity, the duration and the ramification done on behalf
of Federal Government towards the Indian Nations of Canada.
The INM movement will truly have
gained resonance as non First Nations Canadians protest along side, demanding
the Conservative government to desist further attempts to weaken protective
laws designed to achieve the complete removal of a People from the Canadian
landscape.
No comments:
Post a Comment